The Resurrection

The resurrection of Jesus is not merely the resuscitation of a corpse — it is the emergence of a new order of existence: the *eschatological* resurrection life, the life of the age to come, present in history in the one person of Jesus Christ.

Share
The Resurrection
Photo by Lexi Laginess / Unsplash
Table of Content

"He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying."
Matthew 28:6 (NASB)

The resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead is the most important event in human history. Paul states it with absolute clarity: "If Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins" (1 Corinthians 15:17). The resurrection is not a footnote to the cross — it is its vindication, its completion, and its proof. It is the Father's declaration that the sacrifice of the Son was accepted, that sin's penalty has been exhausted, and that death — the final enemy — has been defeated.

The resurrection is also the foundation of Christian hope. Every aspect of salvation — justification, sanctification, glorification — is grounded in the resurrection: "He who was delivered over because of our transgressions, and was raised because of our justification" (Romans 4:25). Because Jesus was raised bodily, all who are united to Him by faith will also be raised bodily — the firstfruits guarantee the harvest (1 Corinthians 15:20).

The resurrection is also the most well-attested event of the ancient world. The evidence — the empty tomb, the multiple eyewitness appearances, the dramatic transformation of the disciples, the conversion of Paul and James, the explosive growth of the early church — constitutes a compelling historical case that goes far beyond what can be accounted for by naturalistic explanations.

N. T. Wright, in his massive historical study The Resurrection of the Son of God (Christian Origins and the Question of God, vol. 3, Fortress Press, 2003, 817 pp.) — the most comprehensive modern scholarly treatment — concludes: "The bodily resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation of all the historical data available. No other hypothesis — theft, swoon, hallucination, legend — can account for the empty tomb, the appearances, the transformation of the disciples, and the explosion of resurrection faith in first-century Judaism with its specific meaning of bodily resurrection" [1].

The Empty Tomb — Matthew 28:1–10

Matthew 28:1–10

"He is not here, for He has risen, just as He said. Come, see the place where He was lying. Go quickly and tell His disciples that He has risen from the dead; and behold, He is going ahead of you into Galilee, there you will see Him; behold, I have told you."

The Empty Tomb — Historical Credibility

The empty tomb is reported in all four Gospels, each with independent details that mark multiple-source tradition. The most important historical observation is the women-as-witnesses detail: all four Gospels agree that women were the first to discover the empty tomb and receive the resurrection announcement. In first-century Jewish and Roman legal culture, women's testimony was routinely discounted ([Josephus, Antiquities 4.8.15: "Let not the testimony of women be admitted, on account of the levity and boldness of their sex"]). No one inventing a resurrection story in the 1st century AD would use women as the primary witnesses — the women-as-witnesses tradition is therefore a strong criterion of embarrassment indicator of historical authenticity.

"He Has Risen, Just as He Said"

ἠγέρθη γὰρ καθὼς εἶπεν (ēgerthē gar kathōs eipen, "He has risen, just as He said") — The aorist passive ἠγέρθη (ēgerthē, from ἐγείρω, egeirō; BDAG 271, "to rise, to be raised up") places the resurrection as a completed, historical fact. The phrase "just as He said" is crucial: Jesus had repeatedly predicted His resurrection (Matthew 16:21; Matthew 17:23; Matthew 20:19; John 2:19). The resurrection validates His words — everything He claimed about Himself is confirmed by the empty tomb.

"Come, see the place where He was lying" — The invitation to see is an invitation to empirical investigation — the tomb is open to inspection, the burial cloths are there (John 20:6–7), but the body is gone. This is not a vision or a spiritual event — it is a physical, spatial, verifiable fact: the tomb is empty.

The Guard at the Tomb — Matthew 27:62–66; 28:11–15

Matthew's unique account of the Roman guard and the bribing of the soldiers (Matthew 28:11–15) is highly significant. The Jewish authorities do not deny the empty tomb — they attempt to explain it by claiming the disciples stole the body. The stolen body theory implicitly confirms the empty tomb: if the body were still there, no theory would be needed. The guards' willingness to accept a bribe (despite the severe punishment for sleeping on duty in Roman military law) confirms the desperation of the authorities to suppress a fact they could not deny.

The Road to Emmaus — Luke 24:13–35

Luke 24:13–35

"And behold, two of them were going that very day to a village named Emmaus... And He said to them, 'O foolish men and slow of heart to believe in all that the prophets have spoken! Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer these things and to enter into His glory?' Then beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures."

Christ the Interpreter of Scripture

"Beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures"ἤρξατο ἀπὸ Μωϋσέως καὶ ἀπὸ πάντων τῶν προφητῶν διερμήνευσεν αὐτοῖς ἐν πάσαις ταῖς γραφαῖς τὰ περὶ ἑαυτοῦδιερμηνεύω (diermēneuō; BDAG 244), "to explain fully, to interpret" — the risen Jesus interprets all the Scriptures as being about Him. This is the hermeneutical principle of the entire NT: Christ is the key to all of Scripture; all of Scripture points to Him. Luke 24:44–45 expands this: "all things which are written about Me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled." The three divisions of the Hebrew Bible (Torah, Neviim, Ketuvim) are all, in their fullness, testimonies to Jesus.

"Was it not necessary for the Christ to suffer?"οὐχὶ ταῦτα ἔδει παθεῖν τὸν χριστόν (ouchi tauta edei pathein ton christon) — ἔδει (edei, imperfect of δεῖ, dei; BDAG 214), "it was necessary, it had to be" — the divine necessity of the suffering and resurrection. The cross was not an unfortunate interruption of the messianic mission — it was the mission. The resurrection was not the consolation prize after the defeat of the cross — it was the completion of the cross, the vindication that the sacrifice was accepted.

The Breaking of Bread — Recognition

"Their eyes were opened and they recognized Him" — The recognition comes at the breaking of bread — the same gesture as the Last Supper (Luke 22:19) and the feeding of the five thousand (Luke 9:16). The risen Christ makes Himself known in the Scriptures (v. 27) and in the breaking of bread (v. 35) — a pattern that anticipates the ongoing experience of the risen Christ in the community's life: through Word and Table.

The Upper Room Appearances — John 20:19–29

John 20:19–29

"So when it was evening on that day, the first day of the week, and when the doors were shut where the disciples were, for fear of the Jews, Jesus came and stood in their midst and said to them, 'Peace be with you.' And when He had said this, He showed them both His hands and His side. The disciples then rejoiced when they saw the Lord."

The Bodily Resurrection — Physical Evidence

"He showed them both His hands and His side"ἔδειξεν αὐτοῖς τὰς χεῖρας καὶ τὴν πλευρὰν — The nail marks in the hands and the spear wound in the side are physical, identifiable marks on the risen body. The resurrection body of Jesus is not a different body — it is the same body, transformed. The wounds remain identifiable. This physical continuity between the crucified body and the risen body is crucial: it confirms both the reality of the death and the reality of the bodily resurrection.

"The doors were shut"τῶν θυρῶν κεκλεισμένων (tōn thurōn kekleismenōn) — the risen body can pass through closed doors, indicating properties of the resurrection body that transcend normal physical limitations. But this same body can be touched, can eat (Luke 24:42–43), and bears the wounds of crucifixion. N. T. Wright describes this as "transphysical" — not non-physical (a ghost or vision) but transformed physical — the same matter, radically changed in its properties. The Resurrection of the Son of God, Fortress Press, 2003, p. 477.

"Peace be with you"Εἰρήνη ὑμῖν (Eirēnē hymin, "Peace to you") — εἰρήνη (eirēnē; BDAG 287) = Hebrew שָׁלוֹם (šālôm), "wholeness, completeness, peace in every dimension." This greeting, spoken after the crucifixion, is the announcement that the work is done — the shalom that sin destroyed is restored. The risen Jesus brings to His disciples what His death accomplished: reconciliation, peace, access to the Father.

The Commission — John 20:21–22

"As the Father has sent Me, I also send you."καθὼς ἀπέσταλκέν με ὁ πατήρ, κἀγὼ πέμπω ὑμᾶς — The mission of the disciples is the extension of Jesus' own mission. The pattern of sending: Father → Son → disciples. And the resource for the mission: "He breathed on them and said, 'Receive the Holy Spirit'" (John 20:22). This anticipatory gift of the Spirit (in John's Gospel) previews Pentecost: the risen Christ breathes the Spirit as the Father breathed life into Adam (Genesis 2:7). The resurrection is the new creation moment — the Spirit-breathed life of the age to come entering the disciples through the risen Christ.

Thomas — "My Lord and My God!" — John 20:26–29

John 20:28

"Thomas answered and said to Him, 'My Lord and my God!'"

ὁ κύριός μου καὶ ὁ θεός μου (ho kyrios mou kai ho theos mou, "My Lord and my God!") — This is the climactic confession of John's Gospel — and the highest Christological title in the entire NT. Thomas addresses Jesus directly as both Lord (kyrios = YHWH) and God (theos). Jesus does not correct him. He does not say "No, Thomas, I am not God — only the Father is God." He receives the confession and pronounces Thomas blessed: "Because you have seen Me, have you believed? Blessed are they who did not see, and yet believed" (John 20:29). Thomas' confession is the intended outcome of the entire Gospel (John 20:31): "written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God."

Jehovah's Witnesses deny that Thomas' confession addressed Jesus as God, claiming he was exclaiming about the Father. But the Greek is unambiguous: he addresses Jesus directly (eipen autō, "he said to Him"), using the personal pronouns "My Lord" and "My God" directed at the risen Jesus in front of him. The direct-address grammar cannot be avoided.

The Galilee Appearance — John 21:1–23

John 21:1–23

"Simon Peter said to them, 'I am going fishing.' They said to him, 'We will also come with you.' They went out and got into the boat; and that night they caught nothing. But when the day was now breaking, Jesus stood on the beach... 'Cast the net on the right-hand side of the boat and you will find a catch.' So they cast, and then they were not able to haul it in because of the great number of fish."

The Reinstatement of Peter

The three-fold question to Peter — "Simon, son of John, do you love Me?" (John 21:15–17) — mirrors Peter's three-fold denial (John 18:15–27). The risen Christ uses the opportunity to restore, not to punish. Each answer of love is met with a commission: "Feed My lambs" / "Shepherd My sheep" / "Feed My sheep" — restoring Peter not only to fellowship but to apostolic leadership. This is grace: failure is not the last word; the risen Christ redeems and recommissions.

ἀγαπάω / φιλέω — The much-discussed alternation between agapaō and phileō in the three questions and answers is significant but possibly over-interpreted. Both words are used in John somewhat interchangeably (cf. John 3:35 vs. John 5:20). What is clear is that Jesus accepts even the lesser phileō in Peter's answer, meeting Peter where he is. The risen Christ's pastoral sensitivity toward the broken disciple is a model of the approach to restoration.

The Appearance to Paul — 1 Corinthians 15:3–11

1 Corinthians 15:3–11

"For I delivered to you as of first importance what I also received, that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, and that He was buried, and that He was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that He appeared to Cephas, then to the twelve. After that He appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom remain until now, but some have fallen asleep; then He appeared to James, then to all the apostles; and last of all, as to one untimely born, He appeared to me also."

The Earliest Creed — Dating the Resurrection Tradition

This passage contains what virtually all NT scholars — whether Christian, Jewish, secular, or skeptical — recognize as a very early Christian creed (paradosis, "tradition" — παρέδωκα... παρέλαβον, paredōka... parelabon, "I delivered... I received"). Paul indicates he received this tradition — he did not compose it himself. The critical question is: when?

Paul's conversion is dated by most scholars to ca. AD 33–35. In Galatians 1:18, Paul says he visited Peter in Jerusalem "three years" after his conversion — ca. AD 36–38 — where he almost certainly received this tradition. The crucifixion is dated ca. AD 30. This places the formal creedal statement within 3–8 years of the crucifixion — far too early for legendary development. Gary Habermas writes: "The pre-Pauline creed of 1 Corinthians 15:3–5 is the most important piece of evidence for the resurrection. It takes us back to within a few years of the events themselves, eliminating the time needed for legend to develop. This is not hearsay but early eyewitness testimony preserved in creedal form" [2].

"Most of whom remain until now" — Paul's statement that 500+ witnesses "remain until now" is an implicit challenge to his Corinthian readers: go ask them. This is the appeal to verifiable, living testimony — not myth but confirmable fact.

The Appearance to James and Paul

The conversion of James, the brother of Jesus (Galatians 1:19) is one of the most powerful historical evidences for the resurrection. During Jesus' ministry, James was a skeptic (John 7:5: "For not even His brothers were believing in Him"). After the resurrection, James became a leader of the Jerusalem church (Acts 15:13; Galatians 2:9) and died as a martyr for his faith (Josephus, Antiquities 20.9.1; Hegesippus, cited in Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 2.23). What changed? Paul tells us: Jesus appeared to James (1 Corinthians 15:7). No other explanation accounts for the transformation of a skeptical brother into a martyred apostle.

Similarly, Paul was an active persecutor of Christians before encountering the risen Christ (Acts 9:1–9; Galatians 1:13–14). The transformation from persecutor to apostle, at enormous personal cost, is best explained by a genuine encounter with the risen Christ. Paul himself lists the resurrection appearance to him as confirmation of his apostleship (1 Corinthians 15:8–9).

The Resurrection and the Gospel — 1 Corinthians 15:12–28

1 Corinthians 15:12–28

"Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, not even Christ has been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is vain, your faith also is vain... But now Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep."

"If Christ Has Not Been Raised..." — Five Catastrophic Consequences

Paul lays out the domino effect if the resurrection is denied (vv. 14–19):

  1. Preaching is vain — the apostolic message has no foundation
  2. Faith is vain — there is nothing to trust in
  3. Apostles are false witnesses — they have testified to something that did not happen
  4. Sin is still present — the atonement is not vindicated and therefore not effective
  5. The dead in Christ are destroyed — those who died trusting Christ are simply gone
  6. We are most pitiable — a life of sacrifice and suffering for nothing

Paul's logic is stringent: the resurrection is not a dispensable ornament of Christian belief; it is the load-bearing wall. Remove it and the entire edifice collapses. Anthony Thiselton comments: "Paul's conditional argument in vv. 12–19 is one of the most rigorous logical constructions in his letters. He is not defending the resurrection on philosophical grounds but establishing that it is the irreducible, indispensable factual foundation of everything else the Gospel claims" [3].

"The First Fruits" — ἀπαρχή

1 Corinthians 15:20

ἀπαρχὴ τῶν κεκοιμημένων (aparchē tōn kekoimēmenōn, "first fruits of those who are asleep") — ἀπαρχή (aparchē; BDAG 98), "first fruits" — the first portion of the harvest offered to God, which guaranteed and consecrated the entire harvest yet to come. Christ's resurrection is not an isolated event — it is the beginning of the general resurrection. Because He rose, His people will rise. His resurrection is both the pledge and the prototype of theirs.

The Last Adam — vv. 21–22

"For since by a man came death, by a man also came the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive." — The redemptive-historical framework: Adam, as the federal head of humanity, brought death to all whom he represented. Christ, as the second federal head, brings resurrection life to all who are united to Him by faith. The resurrection is not individual — it has corporate, cosmic, eschatological scope.

The Consummation — vv. 24–28

The resurrection initiates the final sequence of eschatological events, culminating in the abolition of all competing powers:

"The last enemy that will be abolished is death"ἔσχατος ἐχθρὸς καταργεῖται ὁ θάνατος (eschatos echthros katargeitai ho thanatos, "death, the last enemy, is abolished") — καταργέω (katargeō; BDAG 525), "to render ineffective, to abolish, to put out of operation" — Death is not merely defeated or sidelined — it is permanently made inoperative. At the resurrection, death will have no more domain. This is the eschatological hope: "He will swallow up death for all time" (Isaiah 25:8); "there will no longer be any death" (Revelation 21:4).

The Nature of the Resurrection Body — 1 Corinthians 15:35–58

1 Corinthians 15:35–58

"So also is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown a perishable body, it is raised an imperishable body; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body."

The Contrasts — Four Pairs

Mortal Body Resurrection Body
Perishable (phthorā) Imperishable (aphtharsia)
Dishonor (atimia) Glory (doxa)
Weakness (astheneia) Power (dynamis)
Natural (psychikon) Spiritual (pneumatikon)

"Spiritual body"σῶμα πνευματικόν (sōma pneumatikon) — the most misunderstood phrase in this chapter. Pneumatikon does not mean "non-physical" or "immaterial." In Paul's usage, pneumatikon describes something governed by and animated by the Spirit — as opposed to psychikon (natural, governed by the soul/natural life). The resurrection body is a real, physical body — the same body, transformed — but now fully animated, empowered, and glorified by the Holy Spirit. It is the fullness of what the Spirit is already doing in believers (firstfruits of the Spirit, Romans 8:23).

The Victory Declaration — vv. 54–57

"Death is swallowed up in victory. O Death, where is your victory? O Death, where is your sting?"

Paul quotes Isaiah 25:8 and Hosea 13:14 together as the Scripture fulfilled by the resurrection. νῖκος (nikos; BDAG 673), "victory" — absolute, complete, irreversible victory. The resurrection of Christ is the decisive battle won; the resurrection of believers at His coming is the final victory celebration. The sting of death — its power to condemn, to separate from God — has been drawn by the cross. Death still occurs, but it has lost its ultimate power: it no longer leads to judgment but to resurrection.

OT Prophecy and the Resurrection

Passage Prophecy NT Fulfillment
Psalm 16:10 "You will not allow Your Holy One to undergo decay" Acts 2:27–32 — Peter's Pentecost sermon
Isaiah 25:8 "He will swallow up death for all time" 1 Corinthians 15:54
Hosea 6:2 "He will raise us up on the third day" Pattern fulfilled in Christ's third-day resurrection
Jonah 1:17 Three days in the fish's belly Matthew 12:40 — the sign of Jonah
Psalm 22:22–31 Vindication after suffering — worship of all nations Post-resurrection mission
Isaiah 53:10–12 The Servant will "see His offspring... prolong His days... see of the travail of His soul" Resurrection vindicates the Servant

Psalm 16:10 — The Resurrection Key

Psalm 16:10

"You will not abandon my soul to Sheol; nor will You allow Your Holy One to undergo decay."

Peter's Pentecost sermon (Acts 2:27–32) cites this verse and argues that David could not have been referring to himself (David died, was buried, and his tomb was known — Acts 2:29). Therefore David wrote as a prophet, seeing ahead to the Messiah who would not be abandoned to death but would be raised. This is the apostolic reading of the OT — the Psalms as anticipatory witness to Christ's resurrection. The LXX translates שַׁחַת (šaḥat; BDB 1001, "pit, destruction, decay") as διαφθορά (diaphthora, BDAG 238, "corruption, decay"), establishing the physical dimension of the promise: the Messiah's body would not decay in the tomb.

Historical and Secular Evidence for the Resurrection

The Minimal Facts Approach

Gary Habermas and Michael Licona (The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, Kregel, 2004) identify five facts that virtually all critical NT scholars — across the theological spectrum, from conservative to liberal — accept as historical:

  1. Jesus died by crucifixion — confirmed by Tacitus, Josephus, the Gospels, and Paul
  2. His disciples believed He rose and appeared to them — confirmed by the early creed (1 Corinthians 15), Paul, and multiple sources
  3. Paul, the church's chief persecutor, was suddenly converted — confirmed by Paul himself and Acts
  4. James, the skeptical brother of Jesus, was suddenly converted — confirmed by Paul and Josephus
  5. The tomb was empty — confirmed by the fact that Jewish authorities argued about the explanation (theft) rather than denying the empty tomb

These five minimal facts — held by both conservative and critical scholars — require an explanation. The resurrection of Jesus from the dead accounts for all five naturally and completely. Every alternative hypothesis (theft, swoon, hallucination, legend) fails on multiple counts:

  • Theft theory: contradicted by the guarded tomb, the transformation of the disciples, and Paul's and James' conversions
  • Swoon theory: medically impossible given the extent of the wounds; contradicted by the historical evidence
  • Hallucination theory: hallucinations are individual; 500+ simultaneous witnesses cannot share a hallucination; fails to explain the empty tomb
  • Legend theory: the creed dates within 3–8 years of the events — no time for legend development; furthermore, legends do not generate martyrdom among eyewitnesses who could easily recant

Josephus and the Resurrection

Antiquities 18.3.3 (Testimonium Flavianum) in its probably original core states that Jesus "appeared to them spending a third day restored to life" — though this specific clause may be a Christian interpolation. Even with interpolation removed, Josephus confirms: Jesus' followers claimed resurrection appearances, and this created a community that persisted. (CCEL: Josephus, Antiquities)

The Transformation of the Disciples

The most historically undeniable evidence for the resurrection is the transformation of the disciples. On Good Friday, they were terrified, hiding behind locked doors (John 20:19). Within fifty days, they were publicly proclaiming the resurrection in Jerusalem — the very city of the crucifixion, before the very authorities who had crucified Jesus. They maintained this proclamation in the face of persecution, imprisonment, torture, and death. People die for what they believe to be true; people do not die for what they know to be false. The disciples' willingness to die for the resurrection is the most compelling witness of all.

Theories Against the Resurrection — Answered

Theory Claim Response
Swoon theory Jesus fainted but did not die Roman crucifixion experts verified death; side wound (John 19:34); Pilate confirmed death (Mark 15:44–45); a near-dead Jesus in a tomb could not inspire resurrection faith
Theft theory Disciples stole the body Roman guard placed; disciples had no motive (they were in despair); transformation from fear to bold proclamation unexplained
Wrong tomb theory Women went to the wrong tomb The authorities, who had access to every tomb in Jerusalem, would simply have produced the body
Hallucination theory Appearances were psychological experiences 500+ witnesses at one time; varying locations and circumstances; group experiences cannot be hallucinations; empty tomb unexplained
Legend theory Resurrection stories developed over decades Early creed (1 Cor 15) dates within years of events; eyewitnesses still alive to contradict legends
Islam's substitution theory Allah deceived observers; another was crucified Historically impossible; all sources — Roman, Jewish, and early Christian — confirm Jesus' crucifixion; the claim has no historical evidence

The Resurrection and Its Implications for the Believer

1. JustificationRomans 4:25: "raised because of our justification" — the resurrection is the Father's declaration that the Son's sacrifice was fully accepted and that the judgment against our sin is satisfied. Because He was raised, we are declared righteous.

2. New Life in the PresentRomans 6:4: "we too might walk in newness of life" — the resurrection is not merely a past and future event but a present reality: those united to Christ by faith are already alive in Him (Colossians 3:1: "If you have been raised up with Christ, keep seeking the things above").

3. The Guarantee of Our Own Resurrection1 Corinthians 15:20: "Christ the first fruits." Because He rose, we will rise. His resurrection is the pledge of ours. 1 Thessalonians 4:14: "For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus."

4. The Defeat of FearHebrews 2:14–15: "free those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives." Because the resurrection demonstrates that death has been defeated, the believer is liberated from the ultimate fear — and therefore from the anxieties that flow from it.

5. The Foundation of PreachingActs 1:22: the apostolic witness is fundamentally resurrection-witness. Acts 4:33: "with great power the apostles were giving testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus." The resurrection is not background theology — it is the content of the Gospel proclamation.

Summary

1. The Resurrection as the Vindication of the Cross
The cross alone could be interpreted as defeat or tragedy. The resurrection declares: the sacrifice was accepted, the work was complete, and the crucified One is the exalted Lord. Without the resurrection, the cross has no saving power.

2. The Resurrection as the Beginning of the New Creation
The resurrection of Jesus is not merely the resuscitation of a corpse — it is the emergence of a new order of existence: the eschatological resurrection life, the life of the age to come, present in history in the one person of Jesus Christ. He is the new Adam (1 Corinthians 15:45), the beginning of the new humanity.

3. The Resurrection as the Ground of All Hope
Every promise God has made to His people — the new creation, the resurrection of believers, the judgment of evil, the dwelling of God with humanity — rests on and is guaranteed by the resurrection of Jesus. Remove the resurrection, and hope evaporates. Keep it, and every promise is as sure as the empty tomb.

4. The Resurrection as the Most Attested Event of the Ancient World
The convergence of multiple independent sources, the early creed, the transformation of enemies (Paul, James), the empty tomb, and the witness of 500+ people makes the bodily resurrection of Jesus historically defensible by any rigorous standard of historical investigation.


  1. p. 717 ↩︎

  2. The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus, Kregel, 2004, p. 52 ↩︎

  3. The First Epistle to the Corinthians, NIGTC, Eerdmans, 2000, p. 1217 ↩︎

Access to comments is for premium members only.

Please create a premium account and join the discussion.

Already have an account? Sign in

Read more

Sign up for Value My Soul newsletters.

Stay up to date with curated collection of our top stories.

Please check your inbox and confirm. Something went wrong. Please try again.